filchyboy

A Missive from a Reader

When the man using CONDOM as contraceptive the woman become mad and crazy...this due to the semen of man is remaining in the condom and it was not ejaculated and dropping in vagina of women there is not sweet taste for fucking like that you are drinking tea or coffee with out sugar the coffe or tea is notsweet it is bitter.....semen of man is like sugar it make the coitus and sexmeeting sweet to woman the fuck is sweet - fuck without condom when man is not using CONDOM in fucking woman the semen of man will ejaculated and dropping and falling in vagina of woman then the semen is absorped by vagina wall and inter the blood circulation and raeched the brain then the women maind become in a convenience mood and good feeling she is not be a madden or crazy woman

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ADVICE FOR YOU
******************
To good enjoy and pleasure in your sexual live and good ERECTION of your CLITORIS i give you this advice

>>>>>>>>>. STOP >>>

practice reading and writing ...... because practice reading and writing loosening and lowering the sexual ability and power of you. Go to live in villages and forestries far from cities and towns.
practice READING and WRITING make you unusual woman or SADOMITE ( SODOMY ) women>>>>>>>>

PLEASE NOTE This has been lightly edited for syntax and spelling. The author is not an english speaker. The meaning has been preserved through this editing.

Abstinence, Condoms, and Safe Sex—Sorting Out the Confusion

The recent launch of CDC's Prevention Marketing Initiative (PMI) and, especially, the airing of its new public service announcements have generated a flurry of public comments, most revolving around the abstinence versus condoms issue. Both messages are incorporated in the PMI repertoire because both are critically important strategies for preventing HIV infection.

But what IS abstinence?

CDC's prevention messages encourage abstinence, but studies have shown that the term means different things to different people. For some people, abstinence means voluntarily refraining from all sexual acts, and is often grounded in moral or religious beliefs. For HIV prevention and other public health purposes, abstinence may be defined as refraining from practicing sexual activities that involve vaginal, anal, or oral intercourse.

Delaying the initiation of sexual activity, or practicing abstinence during adolescence, is a valuable health behavior for young people. It also prevents unintended pregnancy and the transmission of other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), many of which can have severe or permanent side effects. (Many people are not aware of the extent and number of STDs in the United States—in addition to gonorrhea, syphilis, and herpes, other serious infections are widespread in the general population, such as chlamydia, human papillomavirus [genital warts], trichomonas, and hepatitis B.)

Abstaining from sexual activity is a 100 percent effective method of avoiding sexually transmitted infections. For most people, however, abstinence is not a lifelong goal, but a temporary, reasonable, and healthy strategy to adopt during certain periods of one's lifetime, e.g., during the emotionally vulnerable adolescent period or between marriages.

Having sexual intercourse with only one uninfected (and faithful) partner is equally as effective as abstinence, but is effective only if it is practiced consistently by both partners in the relationship. (Having a series of monogamous relationships is not a safe prevention strategy.)

To be sure that a person is not infected with HIV, two

separate HIV-antibody test results, 6 months apart, should be

obtained after any behavior that might have resulted in HIV

infection. If the second test is negative 6 months after engaging

in the risky behavior, that person can be reasonably certain that

HIV infection is not present.

What exactly is risky sexual behavior?

Any activity that would allow the exchange of body fluids

(semen, vaginal secretions, or blood) could result in the

transmission of HIV if one of the partners is infected. This means

that all penetrative sexual intercourse (vaginal, oral, or anal)

is risky if latex condoms are not used, or are not used correctly.

Having anal intercourse presents an increased risk for both

homosexual men and heterosexual women. Most heterosexual

transmission occurs through vaginal intercourse, and oral

intercourse has also been reported to transmit HIV.

Kissing generally does not present a risk, but because of the

theoretical risk of HIV transmission through blood that might be present in the mouth, CDC does not recommend engaging in deep (French) kissing with an infected person, or a person whose infection status is unknown.

What about Safe Sex?

Using a latex condom correctly and consistently (i.e., for

each and every act of intercourse) provides a very high degree of

protection. To request a free brochure on the correct way to use

a condom, call the CDC National AIDS Hotline at 1-800-342-AIDS

2437).

Making Responsible Choices

Sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV infection, are

preventable. Individuals have several responsible prevention

strategies to choose from, but the effectiveness of each one

depends largely on using it consistently (every time). Those who

practice abstinence will find it effective only if they

consistently abstain. Similarly, those who choose any of the other

recommended prevention strategies, including using condoms, will

find them highly effective only if used correctly and practiced

consistently.

(CDC HIV/AIDS Prevention. Summer 1994. DISTRIBUTED BY GENA/aegis

(714.248.2836 * 8N1/Full Duplex). SOURCE: Department of Health and

Human Services.)

David Neiwert on the Bush Family & the Nazis

Averell Harriman, too, was a major and reportedly enthusiastic contributor to various eugenics causes, including sponsorship of the 1932 International Congress of Eugenics, held at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Harriman also personally arranged for Hamburg-Amerika to bring Nazi eugenicists, notably the "scientist" most often fingered for inspiring the Holocaust, Dr. Ernst Rudin, who was then a psychiatrist at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy and Demography in Berlin. (Rudin was elected president of the Congress at the New York gathering.) I have found one report that says Bert Walker was among the lesser contributors, but I have found no substantiation of this.

Beyond this, there has never been any hard evidence introduced that would substantiate any connection between either the Walkers or, particularly, Prescott Bush and eugenics. This has been a particularly persistent myth for the latter; it is common to find anti-Bush rants on the Web which claim that the elder Bush lost his campaign for the Senate in 1950 because his supposed connection to "the eugenics movement" had been uncovered.

This is afactual. What happened was that Bush, who had worked hard to recover his public image through his tireless USO work, had won the Republican nomination. But on the Sunday before the election, nationally syndicated columnist Drew Pearson intimated that Bush was president of the Birth Control Society, the predecessor of Planned Parenthood.

As the aforementioned Boston Globe profile details:
At the time, Connecticut was one of two states to ban the use of birth control, including condoms. (The other state was Massachusetts.)

Connecticut was then 55 percent Catholic, ''and the archbishop was death on this birth control thing,'' Prescott Bush recalled. Many voters phoned the Bush home, asking whether the story were true. Bush denied it all, but it was too late. He lost the Senate race by 1,102 votes, setting the family standard for razor-thin elections until his grandson, George Walker Bush, was elected president a half century later.

Vithoon Chaomchaipl & Student Union Condoms

That's probably premature. Prostitution can certainly be a good thing.

There's an awful lot of confusing of issues here. Condoms on a campus certainly have nothing to do with the child sex slave trade.

Proper personal hygiene is not a problem, ever.

Student Union leader Vithoon Chaomchaipl was quoted as saying the leadership voted 6-1 against the plan just ahead of World AIDS Day on December 1 because installing machines "is not the best solution to fight the AIDS problem."

Prophylactics are involved in a wide range of protections against a wide range of infections. AIDS is only one of many such infections. Vithoon Chaomchaipl needs to understand the issues before he makes such votes.

It may be that there is an existing system for those who require condoms to get them affordably and conveniently from sources other than government supplied vending machines in the bathroom of the local student union. In which case Chaomchaipl may have a point and his vote was truly considered. On the other hand such a vending machine may be the only potential local affordable and convenient way to obtain condoms. If that is the case then Chaomchaipl's vote is truly ill considered.

The Hollywood Lube Bandits

"We're offering a reward of 1000 condoms for information leading to the arrest of our burglar."

Life continues to amuse.

Vatican Goes Insane

An ignorant Cardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo, the president of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for the Family, has declared:

"The Aids virus is roughly 450 times smaller than the spermatozoon. The spermatozoon can easily pass through the 'net' that is formed by the condom.

"These margins of uncertainty... should represent an obligation on the part of the health ministries and all these campaigns to act in the same way as they do with regard to cigarettes, which they state to be a danger."

Wow! Okay obviously there is no convincing these fools who obviously have the resources to understand the facts but choose not to. But don't you listen to this fool.

Let me explain. hold on, working